In San Remo Hotel v. City and County of San Francisco (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 239, review granted November 21, 2000, argued December 6, 2001, S091757, the Supreme Court is considering issues regarding the level of scrutiny in takings cases.
Summary of this case from Action Assn. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd.A083530
Filed August 8, 2000 Modified September 6, 2000 MODIFIED AND REPRINTED
See 83 Cal.App.4th 239.
In San Remo Hotel v. City and County of San Francisco (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 239, review granted November 21, 2000, argued December 6, 2001, S091757, the Supreme Court is considering issues regarding the level of scrutiny in takings cases.
Summary of this case from Action Assn. v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd.Full title:SAN REMO HOTEL L.P., et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-Defendants and Appellants…
Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division Five
Date published: Aug 8, 2000
Our holding is based on that provision, and other provisions in the Planning Code and the Hotel Ordinance…
San Remo Hotel v. City and County of San FranciscoAppeal from the Superior Court San Francisco County, No. 950166, Judge: Ina Levin Geymant, William J. Cahill…