From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

San Francisco Gaslight Co. v. Schottler

Supreme Court of California
Nov 16, 1882
62 Cal. 119 (Cal. 1882)

Opinion

         Appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Allen, J.

         Application for a writ of review. The facts in this case are in all material respects similar to the case of Spring Valley Water Works v. Schottler et al., ante, 69. The proceedings before the Board of Equalization, in both cases, were heard together. After the decision a petition for a rehearing was presented and denied.

         COUNSEL

          Clement, Osment & Clement, and W. T. Wallace, for Appellant.

          John L. Love and W. C. Burnett, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Morrison, C.J., did not participate.

         OPINION

         In Bank. The Court:

         Upon the authority of Spring Valley Water Works v. Schottler et al., No. 8,052 (opinion this day filed), ante, 69, and for the reasons given in the opinion, the judgment of the Court below is affirmed.


Summaries of

San Francisco Gaslight Co. v. Schottler

Supreme Court of California
Nov 16, 1882
62 Cal. 119 (Cal. 1882)
Case details for

San Francisco Gaslight Co. v. Schottler

Case Details

Full title:SAN FRANCISCO GASLIGHT COMPANY v. ANTONE SCHOTTLER et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Nov 16, 1882

Citations

62 Cal. 119 (Cal. 1882)

Citing Cases

People v. Mason

Some of the circumstances, just referred to, are (1) that the term "pinball machine" is not in the main part…