From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samuels v. Town of Clarkson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 17, 1982
91 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

December 17, 1982

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Patlow, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Schnepp, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs appeal from a Special Term order which granted the motion of defendant Cole-Layer-Trumble Co., Inc. (Cole), made pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) for an order dismissing their complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Section 572 Real Prop. Tax of the Real Property Tax Law authorizes the taxing authority to utilize the assistance of experts to appraise the value of property in the assessment of real property. The assessment process would be invalid if the assessors merely accepted the figures supplied by outside appraisers (Real Property Tax Law, § 572; Matter of Lessen v Stevens, 30 A.D.2d 740) as the primary responsibility for any assessment remains with the assessor (Real Property Tax Law, § 102, subds 2, 3). It is the obligation of the assessor to make the final determination after verification and independent evaluation of the expert's figures. Cole's authority was limited and subject to the assessor's evaluation which is markedly different from those situations relied upon by plaintiffs (cf. Persichilli v Triborough Bridge Tunnel Auth., 21 A.D.2d 819). Here, Cole owes no duty to plaintiffs for its work. In the absence of duty, there is no breach and without a breach there is no liability. Thus, Cole may not be held liable ( Pulka v Edelman, 40 N.Y.2d 781). Consequently, Special Term did not err in dismissing plaintiffs' complaint.


Summaries of

Samuels v. Town of Clarkson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 17, 1982
91 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Samuels v. Town of Clarkson

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD SAMUELS et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF CLARKSON, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1982

Citations

91 A.D.2d 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Xerox Corp. v. Kuhn

While the adoption of the 1985 assessment might be an admission of value at the time of the 1985 assessment,…

Matter of Town of Cairo v. Town of Cairo

Finnegan appeals. We reverse. Initially, it is settled law that an expert appraiser, hired by a municipality…