From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samuelian v. U.S. Treasury

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-995-JAM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:18-cv-995-JAM-EFB PS

07-02-2018

SANDRA C. SAMUELIAN, Plaintiff, v. U.S. TREASURY, et al., Defendants.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Plaintiff, proceeding in pro se, has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. Plaintiff's affidavit, submitted in support of her application as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), demonstrates that she is not eligible for in forma pauperis status. Id.

This case, in which plaintiff is proceeding pro se, is before the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). --------

Pursuant to federal statute, a filing fee of $350.00 is required to commence a civil action in federal district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). This court also requires a $50 administrative fee. The court may authorize the commencement of an action without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor, by a person who submits an affidavit showing that he is unable to pay such costs or give security therefor. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). An in forma pauperis applicant must demonstrate that because of her poverty, she cannot meet court costs and still provide herself and her dependents with the necessities of life. Martinez v. Kristi Kleaners, Inc., 364 F.3d 1305, 1307 (11th Cir. 2004) (affidavit is sufficient if it represents that the litigant is "unable to pay for the court fees and costs, and to provide necessities for himself and his dependents") (citing Adkins v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948)); see also Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., 865 F.2d 22, 23 (2d Cir. 1988) (denying in forma pauperis status where applicant had a net income of approximately $20,000).

Plaintiff's affidavit indicates that she has $894,000 in checking and savings accounts. ECF No. 2 at 2. She further states that she has no dependents relying on her for support. Id. Based on those averments, the court cannot find that plaintiff has demonstrated that she has insufficient assets to pay the filing fee and costs and provide the necessities of life to herself and her dependents.

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied, and that plaintiff be given thirty days in which to pay the filing fee of $400.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: July 2, 2018.

/s/_________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Samuelian v. U.S. Treasury

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 2, 2018
No. 2:18-cv-995-JAM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2018)
Case details for

Samuelian v. U.S. Treasury

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA C. SAMUELIAN, Plaintiff, v. U.S. TREASURY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 2, 2018

Citations

No. 2:18-cv-995-JAM-EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2018)