From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samuel v. Holbrook, Cabot Rollins Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 11, 1915
109 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1915)

Opinion

Argued April 26, 1915

Decided May 11, 1915

Thomas E. O'Brien and Thomas F Conway for appellant.

Frederick C. McLaughlin for respondents.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, CARDOZO and SEABURY, JJ. Absent: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J.


Summaries of

Samuel v. Holbrook, Cabot Rollins Corporation

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 11, 1915
109 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1915)
Case details for

Samuel v. Holbrook, Cabot Rollins Corporation

Case Details

Full title:FRANK SAMUEL et al., Doing Business under the Firm Name of FRANK SAMUEL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 11, 1915

Citations

109 N.E. 1092 (N.Y. 1915)
109 N.E. 1092

Citing Cases

Hamlet at Willow v. Northeast

Contrary to Northeast's second contention, soil or sand which has been severed from realty becomes personal…