From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sampson v. School District of Lancaster

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 12, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-6414 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-6414.

June 12, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2009, upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants School District of Lancaster, Rita Bishop, Curt Baker, and Robert Bourdeaux (Doc. No. 60), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Counts I, III and V.
2. The Motion is DENIED with respect to Count VI.
3. Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim against Defendant Rita Bishop in her official capacity is DISMISSED as redundant of Plaintiff's Title VII retaliation claim against the District of Lancaster.
4. Defendants Rita Bishop, Curt Baker, and Robert Bourdeaux are DISMISSED from this action.
5. The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's claim of punitive damages for violation of Count VI.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sampson v. School District of Lancaster

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 12, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-6414 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2009)
Case details for

Sampson v. School District of Lancaster

Case Details

Full title:ROSEMARIA McNEIL SAMPSON v. THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LANCASTER, ET AL

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 12, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-6414 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Weeks v. Leeward Islands Apothecaries

A suit naming an individual in his official capacity is considered a suit against the employer. Sampson v.…

Reed v. Chambersburg Area Sch. Dist. Found.

He additionally avers that the District's board president made a stigmatizing statement in an April 15, 2013…