Summary
In Sampson v. Fox, 109 Ala. 662, 19 So. 896, 55 Am. St. Rep. 950, it was sought to impute to the president and stockholders of the corporation its default in failing to pay a designated indebtedness.
Summary of this case from Rudisill Soil Pipe Co. v. Eastham Soil PipeOpinion
Case No. 5:18-cv-1834-LSC-GMB
09-18-2019
SEAN LEE SAMPSON, Plaintiff, v. CAPTAIN DARRELL FOX, et al., Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The magistrate judge filed a report on August 27, 2019, recommending this action be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). (Doc. 10). Although the magistrate judge advised the plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days, no objections have been received by the court.
Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Additionally, the plaintiff's state law claims asserted in the complaint are due to be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3).
A Final Judgment will be entered.
DONE AND ORDERED ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2019.
/s/_________
L. SCOTT COOGLER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
160704