Summary
declining supplemental jurisdiction over claims alleging violations of the Maryland Confidentiality of Records Act where state courts had not yet addressed the issues
Summary of this case from Potts v. PottsOpinion
No. 08-1691.
Submitted: March 31, 2009.
Decided: April 16, 2009.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:06-cv-01819-WDQ).
R. Scott Oswald, Adam Augustine Carter, Gregory Sharma-Holt, The Employment Law Group, PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Kevin Karpinski, Victoria M. Shearer, Karpinski, Colaresi Karp, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ina Sampson appeals the district court's order granting defendant's motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sampson v. City of Cambridge, No. 1:06-cv-01819-WDQ (D. Md. June 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.