From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Samper v. University of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1988
144 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

November 15, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Wesley, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.


Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The court should not have dismissed plaintiffs' cause of action alleging discrimination under Civil Rights Law §§ 40-c and 40-d against defendants University of Rochester, Strong Memorial Hospital, and Ronald A. Gabel, M.D. Since plaintiffs alleged sufficient facts to sustain a cause of action under the Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 296 [a]) against these defendants, the cause of action under the Civil Rights Law must likewise be sustained (see, People v. Hamilton, 125 A.D.2d 1000, 1001).


Summaries of

Samper v. University of Rochester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 15, 1988
144 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Samper v. University of Rochester

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES SAMPER et al., Appellants, v. UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 15, 1988

Citations

144 A.D.2d 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Panzica v. Mas-Maz, Inc.

Id. Claims for disability discrimination arising under the New York State Human Rights Law or New York Civil…

Ganzy v. Allen Christina School

Facts sufficient to sustain a cause of action under New York Executive Law section 296 will support a cause…