From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salter v. City of Thomaston

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 16, 1991
409 S.E.2d 88 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

holding that employment decisions of a city manager are quasi-judicial in nature and thus subject to review by petition for writ of certiorari

Summary of this case from Lockette v. City of Albany

Opinion

A91A0933, A91A1023.

DECIDED JULY 16, 1991.

Petition for certiorari. Upson Superior Court. Before Judge Miller.

Virgil L. Brown Associates, Virgil L. Brown, Bentley C. Adams III, Eric D. Hearn, for appellant.

Adams, Barfield Dunaway, David B. Dunaway, for appellee.


Appellant was employed by the City of Thomaston. His employment was terminated and he appealed to the City Manager. Following a hearing in which testimony was presented and preserved, the City Manager made findings of fact and conclusions upholding the termination of appellant's employment. The "decision" of the City Manager, rendered on December 28, 1990, reads: "It is the decision of the City Manager that the termination of the employment of Mr. Salter by Mr. Green is approved, and Mr. Salter's appeal therefrom is denied." (Emphasis supplied.)

On January 28, 1991, appellant presented a petition for a writ of certiorari to the superior court. The superior court dismissed the petition, ruling that it was presented out of time.

Appellant sought and we granted a discretionary appeal from the order of dismissal. The discretionary appeal bears Case No. A91A1023. In addition, appellant directly appealed from the order of dismissal. The direct appeal bears Case No. A91A0933. Held:

1. We are without jurisdiction to entertain the direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Accordingly, Case No. A91A0933 must be dismissed. See Hogan v. Taylor County Bd. of Education, 157 Ga. App. 680 ( 278 S.E.2d 106).

2. The superior court erred in dismissing appellant's petition for a writ of certiorari. The petition was timely. The last day for filing the petition for a writ of certiorari fell on a Sunday. Thus, appellant had until Monday, January 28, 1991 to file the petition. OCGA § 9-11-6 (a). The superior court erred in ruling otherwise.

Conceding the petition for a writ of certiorari was presented in a timely fashion, the City argues that the trial court did not err in dismissing the petition anyway because the City Manager did not exercise judicial powers in making his decision. We disagree.

In entertaining appellant's appeal, the City Manager clearly "performed the function of a civil service board. It has been generally held that the rulings of such tribunals are quasi-judicial in nature. [Cits.]" Raughton v. Town of Fort Oglethorpe, 177 Ga. App. 171, 172 ( 338 S.E.2d 754). Thus, the city manager's decision was subject to review by petition for a writ of certiorari. OCGA § 5-4-1 (a); Raughton v. Town of Fort Oglethorpe, supra.

Appeal dismissed in Case No. A91A0933. Judgment reversed in Case No. A91A1023. Sognier, C. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

DECIDED JULY 16, 1991.


Summaries of

Salter v. City of Thomaston

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 16, 1991
409 S.E.2d 88 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)

holding that employment decisions of a city manager are quasi-judicial in nature and thus subject to review by petition for writ of certiorari

Summary of this case from Lockette v. City of Albany

relying on § 5-6-35 to dismiss a direct appeal from a superior court decision reviewing a decision of a lower tribunal by writ of certiorari

Summary of this case from Wolfe v. Regents of the Univ. Sys. of Ga.
Case details for

Salter v. City of Thomaston

Case Details

Full title:SALTER v. CITY OF THOMASTON (two cases)

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 16, 1991

Citations

409 S.E.2d 88 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
409 S.E.2d 88

Citing Cases

Crumpler v. Henry Cty

The hearing before the county manager was a quasi-judicial hearing because it included notice, a hearing, and…

Lewis v. City of Elizabeth

The Farmer court explained that in entertaining the Administrator's appeal, the Board of Commissioners…