From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salmon v. Salmon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 11, 1933
185 N.E. 775 (N.Y. 1933)

Summary

In Salmon v. Salmon (261 N.Y. 646, supra), a 1921 agreement actually relieved the husband of his duty of support by providing for an initial lump sum payment (of $2,150) and for weekly payments of alimony — at first of $12.50 and then of $7.50 — for only 12 years, explicitly specifying, as it did, that "no further payments shall be required after July 11, 1933"; thus, in short, the agreement provided for an ultimate cessation of all support.

Summary of this case from McMains v. McMains

Opinion

Argued March 2, 1933

Decided April 11, 1933

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

David Klein, Solomon Jacobson and Henry Fluegelman for appellant.

Lawrence Wiseman and Arthur A. Beaudry for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: POUND, Ch. J., CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, HUBBS and CROUCH, JJ.


Summaries of

Salmon v. Salmon

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 11, 1933
185 N.E. 775 (N.Y. 1933)

In Salmon v. Salmon (261 N.Y. 646, supra), a 1921 agreement actually relieved the husband of his duty of support by providing for an initial lump sum payment (of $2,150) and for weekly payments of alimony — at first of $12.50 and then of $7.50 — for only 12 years, explicitly specifying, as it did, that "no further payments shall be required after July 11, 1933"; thus, in short, the agreement provided for an ultimate cessation of all support.

Summary of this case from McMains v. McMains
Case details for

Salmon v. Salmon

Case Details

Full title:LEONORE SALMON, Respondent, v. JACQUES SALMON, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 11, 1933

Citations

185 N.E. 775 (N.Y. 1933)
185 N.E. 775

Citing Cases

McMains v. McMains

Throughout the country (see decisions collected at 58 A.L.R. 639 et seq., and 109 A.L.R. 1068 et seq.), a…