From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sallah v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 14, 2018
Case No. 2:16-cv-14098 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 14, 2018)

Summary

discussing harmless error but ultimately rejecting the argument because the state agency disability determination in that case was neither conclusory nor unsupported by medical evidence

Summary of this case from Howard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Opinion

Case No. 2:16-cv-14098

03-14-2018

CHRISTINE SALLAH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


MAGISTRATE STEPHANIE DAWKINS DAVIS ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [19] , GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [15], AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [17]

The Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("SSA") denied Plaintiff's application for Supplemental Security Income and Disability Insurance Benefits in a decision issued by an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ"). The SSA Appeals Council declined to review the ruling, and Plaintiff appealed. The Court referred the matter to the magistrate judge and the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation ("Report") suggesting the Court grant Plaintiff's motion and deny the Commissioner's motion.

Civil Rule 72(b) governs review of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation. De novo review of the magistrate judge's findings is only required if the parties "serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Because neither party filed timely objections, de novo review of the Report's conclusions is not required. Having examined the record, the Court finds that the magistrate judge's conclusions are factually based and legally sound.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation [19] is ADOPTED, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [15] is GRANTED, the Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment [17] is DENIED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to the Report.

SO ORDERED.

s/Stephen J. Murphy, III

STEPHEN J. MURPHY, III

United States District Judge Dated: March 14, 2018 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on March 14, 2018, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

s/David P. Parker

Case Manager


Summaries of

Sallah v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Mar 14, 2018
Case No. 2:16-cv-14098 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 14, 2018)

discussing harmless error but ultimately rejecting the argument because the state agency disability determination in that case was neither conclusory nor unsupported by medical evidence

Summary of this case from Howard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Sallah v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE SALLAH, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2018

Citations

Case No. 2:16-cv-14098 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 14, 2018)

Citing Cases

Howard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

(Tr. 19). Although the ALJ did not explain at great length why Dr. Walker's opinion was unsupported by the…