From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sales, Inc. v. R Consulting

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.
Aug 27, 2021
68 Cal.App.5th 63 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. D076923.

08-27-2021

SALES, INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents. ANDY KIM, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. R CONSULTING


[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION]

Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part II.B.

[Modification of opinion (67 Cal.App.5th 263; ___ Cal.Rptr.3d ___), upon denial of rehearing.]

THE COURT.—IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed on July 30, 2021, be modified as follows:

On page 16 [67 Cal.App.5th, advance report, unpublished part II.B.], second sentence of the first full paragraph after part II.B., change "against" to "in favor of" so the sentence reads:

Were we to do so, we would nonetheless affirm the judgment in favor of R Consulting and Michel because Kim failed to provide a complete record for us to review.

There is no change in the judgment.


Summaries of

Sales, Inc. v. R Consulting

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.
Aug 27, 2021
68 Cal.App.5th 63 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Sales, Inc. v. R Consulting

Case Details

Full title:SALES, INC. et al., Defendants and Respondents. ANDY KIM, Plaintiff and…

Court:Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

Date published: Aug 27, 2021

Citations

68 Cal.App.5th 63 (Cal. Ct. App. 2021)