From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Salama v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 1, 1965
16 N.Y.2d 1058 (N.Y. 1965)

Opinion

Argued October 27, 1965

Decided December 1, 1965

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MITCHELL D. SCHWEITZER, J.

Milton S. Ringler for appellants.

Harold L. Schwab, Emile Z. Berman and A. Harold Frost for respondent.


In each of the above-entitled actions: Order of Appellate Division reversed and that of Special Term reinstated, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Division. A motion to dismiss under CPLR 3216 cannot be granted prior to the filing of a note of issue unless defendant has first served a written demand on the plaintiff to serve and file the note of issue within 45 days in accordance with the terms of the statute. (Cf. Fischer v. Pan Amer. World Airways, 16 N.Y.2d 725.)

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges DYE, FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI and BERGAN.


Summaries of

Salama v. Cohen

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 1, 1965
16 N.Y.2d 1058 (N.Y. 1965)
Case details for

Salama v. Cohen

Case Details

Full title:EDMUND SALAMA, Appellant, v. VICTOR COHEN, Respondent. ANGELA TOMICH et…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 1, 1965

Citations

16 N.Y.2d 1058 (N.Y. 1965)
266 N.Y.S.2d 131
213 N.E.2d 461

Citing Cases

Cohn v. Borchard Affiliations

In the plainest of terms, the 1965 bill required that the 45-day demand prescription was to be applied to all…

Wilson v. Boerum Auto Service, Inc.

Defendant's motion was denied because of its failure to show that it had served the 45-day notice required by…