From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sakos v. Byers

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1932
162 A. 580 (N.J. 1932)

Opinion

Argued May 23, 1932 —

Decided October 17, 1932.

The legislature vested the right of action for a wrongful death in an administrator ad prosequendum. A release given by the general administrator prior to the recovery of final judgment in no way affects the action vested in the administrator ad prosequendum.

On appeal from the Supreme Court.

For the plaintiff-appellant, Silber Silber ( Osie M. Silber).

For the defendants-respondents, Frank G. Turner.


The plaintiff brought this action as administrator ad prosequendum under the Death act. 2 Comp. Stat., p. 1904; 1 Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat., p. 926. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action and the plaintiff appeals. It appears from the record that an attempt at settlement was made with the general administrator and money was paid thereunder. The learned trial judge directed the jury that in assessing damages credit should be given for the amount so paid. In this there was error.

The statute ( Pamph. L. 1917, p. 531; 1 Cum. Supp. Comp. Stat., p. 928) gives the right of action to the administrator ad prosequendum. That the moneys recovered are distributed by the general administrator, according to the law, can in no way affect the right of action. Stagg v. McCann, 95 N.J. Eq. 53; 96 Id. 327. Nor does the circumstance that the general administrator may recover for the loss to the estate between injury and death affect the present action. Soden v. Trenton and Mercer Traction Co., 101 N.J.L. 393 .

The 1917 amendment to the Death act changes the procedure to enforce the claim given by the Death act. It vests the right of action for a wrongful death in the administrator ad prosequendum. The legislature not only gave a cause of action but vested the right to enforce the same in a special administrator. The right to enforce the claim exists until the recovery of final judgment, and the acts of a stranger cannot disturb the proceeding.

Other matters suggested in the record need no discussion.

The judgment is reversed.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 12.


Summaries of

Sakos v. Byers

Court of Errors and Appeals
Oct 17, 1932
162 A. 580 (N.J. 1932)
Case details for

Sakos v. Byers

Case Details

Full title:ANNA SAKOS (SOCKOS), ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF STEPHEN SAKOS…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Oct 17, 1932

Citations

162 A. 580 (N.J. 1932)
162 A. 580

Citing Cases

Sakos v. Byers

There was no error in the rulings complained of. This court held in the instant case, in reversing the…

Brennan v. Rooney

"No release or cancellation of a judgment, whether by warrant or otherwise, by an administrator ad…