From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SAHR v. WAL-MART STORES

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 20, 2006
477 Mich. 858 (Mich. 2006)

Opinion

No. 131133.

September 20, 2006.

Summary Dispositions SC: 131133, COA: 262952, WCAC: 02-000497.


Summary Dispositions September 20, 2006:

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstate the decision of the magistrate. The Court of Appeals erred by finding that the Workers' Compensation Appellate Commission (WCAC) had offered adequate reasons for rejecting the magistrate's reliance on and interpretation of the testimony of plaintiff's treating neurosurgeon. Mudel v Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co, 462 Mich 691, 703 (2000). The WCAC rejected all of the reasons provided by the magistrate for finding that plaintiff had failed to meet her burden of proving workplace causation for her back complaints because the treating doctor did not directly relate plaintiffs disability to her smoking. Because the magistrate did not base her decision on any such alleged opinion by the treating doctor, the WCAC did not provide an adequate reason for rejecting the magistrate's comprehensive findings as unsupported by competent, material, and substantial evidence.

CAVANAGH, J. I would deny leave to appeal.

KELLY, J., did not participate.


Summaries of

SAHR v. WAL-MART STORES

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 20, 2006
477 Mich. 858 (Mich. 2006)
Case details for

SAHR v. WAL-MART STORES

Case Details

Full title:LAURA A. SAHR, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 20, 2006

Citations

477 Mich. 858 (Mich. 2006)
721 N.W.2d 172

Citing Cases

People v. Parsons

Most significant about Justice Weaver's novel reliance on this constitutional provision is her selective…