From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sager v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 29, 1917
76 So. 927 (Ala. 1917)

Opinion

5 Div. 682.

November 29, 1917.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Elmore County; J. S. Williams, Judge.

J. A. Holmes, of Elmore, for appellant. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P. W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The defendant was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death.

He appeals on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and we are unable to review the action of the trial court in overruling defendant's motion to quash the indictment because found by an illegal grand jury, or to quash the venire because a true copy of the indictment was not served on him therewith. Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18, 14 So. 327; Rudolph v. State, 172 Ala. 379, 55 So. 610.

For the same reason we cannot review the action of the trial court in overruling defendant's objections to being put upon trial because of the defect and omission above mentioned.

The demurrer to the indictment because of the alleged illegality of the grand jury was, of course, properly overruled, no defect appearing on the face of the indictment.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Affirmed. All the Justices concur, except MAYFIELD, J., not sitting.


Summaries of

Sager v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Nov 29, 1917
76 So. 927 (Ala. 1917)
Case details for

Sager v. State

Case Details

Full title:SAGER v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Nov 29, 1917

Citations

76 So. 927 (Ala. 1917)
76 So. 927

Citing Cases

Morris v. State

The motion cannot be reviewed, as it appears only in the record proper. 1 Ala. App. 140, 55 So. 449; 10 Ala.…

Hudson v. State

Motion to quash was properly overruled. Code 1923, § 5202; Smith v. State, 142 Ala. 14, 39 So. 329; Kreutner…