From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Safeco Ins. Co. v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 16, 1990
915 F.2d 1565 (4th Cir. 1990)

Summary

affirming grant of summary judgment for defendant nurses where plaintiff did not show they "did anything but follow Dr. Smith's orders in forcibly administering the medication."

Summary of this case from Webber v. Hussain

Opinion

No. 89-2822.

October 16, 1990.

Appeal from the D.S.C.


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Safeco Ins. Co. v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 16, 1990
915 F.2d 1565 (4th Cir. 1990)

affirming grant of summary judgment for defendant nurses where plaintiff did not show they "did anything but follow Dr. Smith's orders in forcibly administering the medication."

Summary of this case from Webber v. Hussain

In Millner v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc, 915 F.2d 1565 (Table), 1990 WL 143608 (4th Cir. 1990), an employee sued his employer for violation of Title VII, alleging he was denied promotions in retaliation for reporting the employer to the EEOC in other matters.

Summary of this case from Greene v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories
Case details for

Safeco Ins. Co. v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 16, 1990

Citations

915 F.2d 1565 (4th Cir. 1990)

Citing Cases

Webber v. Hussain

Bowers v. Seymour, 436 Fed. App'x 676, 681 (7th Cir. 2011) ("Johnson, Seymour, and Schuknecht are nurses, and…

Greene v. Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories

In light of that evidence, plaintiff must have offered more evidence than her own speculation that she was…