From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Safe Auto Ins. Co. v. Oriental-Guillermo

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jun 4, 2018
187 A.3d 204 (Pa. 2018)

Opinion

No. 791 MAL 2017

06-04-2018

SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY v. Rene ORIENTAL–GUILLERMO, Rachel Dixon, Priscila Jimenez, Luis Jimenez, Alli Licona Avila and Iris Velazquez Petition of: Priscila Jimenez & Luis Jimenez


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:

a. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the unlisted resident driver exclusion in a Personal Auto Policy is valid and enforceable and not violative of the terms and provisions of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1701, et. seq.?
b. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the unlisted resident driver exclusion in a Personal Auto Policy is valid and enforceable and not violative of the public policy of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as embodied in § 1786 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1786, which implicitly directs that all permissive users of an insured vehicle be insured under the owner's insurance policy?


Summaries of

Safe Auto Ins. Co. v. Oriental-Guillermo

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jun 4, 2018
187 A.3d 204 (Pa. 2018)
Case details for

Safe Auto Ins. Co. v. Oriental-Guillermo

Case Details

Full title:SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY v. RENE ORIENTAL-GUILLERMO, RACHEL DIXON…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Jun 4, 2018

Citations

187 A.3d 204 (Pa. 2018)

Citing Cases

Safe Auto Ins. Co. v. Oriental-Guillermo

b. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the [URDE] in a Personal Auto Policy is…

Safe Auto Ins. Co. v. Oriental-Guillermo

b. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the [URDE] in a Personal Auto Policy is…