From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sacco v. Bodwitch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 21, 1970
34 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Opinion

May 21, 1970

Appeal from the Oswego Trial Term.

Present — Del Vecchio, J.P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The receipt of the opinions of two Deputy Sheriffs as to the point of collision between two automobiles based upon the position of the two automobiles after the accident and the location of the debris was error. They were not qualified as experts. Even if they had been, the conclusion was within the competence of the jurors. ( Meiselman v. Crown Hgts. Hosp., 285 N.Y. 389, 396.) However, there being other uncontradicted proof which put the collision at the same place, the error was not prejudicial and does not require reversal. (CPLR 2002; Martin v. Marshall, 25 A.D.2d 594.)


Summaries of

Sacco v. Bodwitch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 21, 1970
34 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)
Case details for

Sacco v. Bodwitch

Case Details

Full title:MARY E. SACCO, as Administratrix of the Estate of JOSEPH E. SACCO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 21, 1970

Citations

34 A.D.2d 885 (N.Y. App. Div. 1970)

Citing Cases

Stafford v. Mussers Potato Chips, Inc.

He was permitted upon cross-examination to fix the point of impact in the southbound or defendant's lane of…

Pelin v. Bodwitch

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Same memorandum as in Sacco v. Bodwitch ( 34 A.D.2d 885).…