From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rye v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 24, 2007
Civil No. 06-3288 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Aug. 24, 2007)

Opinion

Civil No. 06-3288 (RHK/JSM).

August 24, 2007


ORDER


The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated July 30, 2007. No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all of the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 68) is ADOPTED;
2. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 60) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Rye v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 24, 2007
Civil No. 06-3288 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Aug. 24, 2007)
Case details for

Rye v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Wendy Rye, Plaintiff, v. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 24, 2007

Citations

Civil No. 06-3288 (RHK/JSM) (D. Minn. Aug. 24, 2007)

Citing Cases

Sprafka v. Medical Device Business Services, Inc.

Expert testimony is required under Minnesota law in products liability cases involving medical devices…