From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rustad v. United States

U.S.
Nov 24, 1958
358 U.S. 898 (1958)

Summary

adopting Restatement of Torts § 757

Summary of this case from Mabrey v. Sandstream

Opinion

No. 425.

November 24, 1958.


Facts and opinion, 258 F.2d 563, 17 Alaska 679.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Denied.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice WHITTAKER are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.


Summaries of

Rustad v. United States

U.S.
Nov 24, 1958
358 U.S. 898 (1958)

adopting Restatement of Torts § 757

Summary of this case from Mabrey v. Sandstream

adopting the Restatement of Torts, § 757, cmt. b

Summary of this case from Birnbaum v. Alliance, Am. Ins

commenting that attempts to define reasonable doubt ought to be discontinued

Summary of this case from State v. Turic
Case details for

Rustad v. United States

Case Details

Full title:Thomas B. RUSTAD, Harvey R. Wyborney, Homer C. Skelly, et al.…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 24, 1958

Citations

358 U.S. 898 (1958)
79 S. Ct. 222
17 Alaska 527

Citing Cases

People v. Hicks

• 1 The granting of a mistrial due to prejudicial publicity is a matter addressed to the sound discretion of…

Kamin v. Kuhnau

It has been recognized in the cases that a manufacturer who has been employed to develop an inventor's ideas…