Russ Bldg. Partnership v. City and County of San Francisco

Full title: RUSS BUILDING PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO…

Court: Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jun 3, 1987

237 Cal. Rptr. 456 (Cal. 1987)

737 P.2d 359

Opinion

Page __

__ Cal.3d __ 237 Cal.Rptr. 456, 737 P.2d 359 RUSS BUILDING PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent (And Companion Cases). Supreme Court of California June 3, 1987

         Prior report: Cal.App., 234 Cal.Rptr. 1.

         The order granting review, 236 Cal.Rptr. 403, 735 P.2d 444, is hereby modified: Petition for review by Russ Building Partnership DENIED. Petition for review by the City and County of San Francisco GRANTED.

         Pursuant to rule 29.2(b) of the California Rules of Court, review is limited to and briefs on the merits are to be confined to the following issues, discussed in Part V of the opinion of the Court of Appeal: (1) whether extrinsic evidence is relevant for interpreting the building permit; and (2) whether the permit, properly interpreted, gave adequate notice to appellants of the development fee imposed after the permits were issued.

         Review shall not extend to the issues raised in the answers to the petitions for review.

         LUCAS, C.J., and MOSK, PANELLI, ARGUELLES, EAGLESON and KAUFMAN, JJ., concur.