From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RUSK v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Nov 22, 1994
1994 OK 128 (Okla. 1994)

Opinion

No. 84433.

November 22, 1994.


ORDER

On the Court's own motion, this appeal is dismissed as untimely. The petition in error was not mailed in compliance with 12 O.S.Supp. 1993 § 990A[ 12-990A] and Rule 1.15 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases in that it was mailed by priority mail rather than by certified mail, return receipt requested. The date of filing of the petition in error was the date it was received by the clerk rather than the date of mailing, which was more than 30 days after the filing of the judgment. Eagle Life Ins. Co. v. Rush, 832 P.2d 1224 (Okla. 1992), Woods v. Woods, 830 P.2d 1372 (Okla. 1992).

/s/ Ralph B. Hodges CHIEF JUSTICE

HODGES, C.J., and SIMMS, OPALA, ALMA WILSON and SUMMERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

RUSK v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Nov 22, 1994
1994 OK 128 (Okla. 1994)
Case details for

RUSK v. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. NO. 1

Case Details

Full title:TARA RUSK, A MINOR, AND THROUGH HER NEXT OF KIN AND BEST FRIEND, JOYCE…

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 22, 1994

Citations

1994 OK 128 (Okla. 1994)
1994 OK 128

Citing Cases

Whitehead v. Tulsa Public Schools

By published order, this Court sua sponte dismissed a petition in error that was mailed by priority mail for…