From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 11, 2000
CIV. S-92-812 GEB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2000)

Opinion

CIV. S-92-812 GEB.

September 11, 2000.

Jane Zerbi, Dickstein Merin; Art Bunce, Law Offices of Art Bunce; George Forman, Forman Prochaska; Frank Lawrence, Holland Knight Bernard Simons, Sanders, Barnet, Goldamn, Simons Mosk; Diane Viotls, Viejas Legal Department; Glenn Fledman, Rapport Marston for Plaintiffs.

Sara J. Drake, Deputy Atty. Gen. for Defendants.


ORDER


The opinion filed September 16, 1998, and reported at 39 F. Supp.2d 1227 (E.D. Cal. 1998), is withdrawn and the judgment entered on the same date is vacated.

I did not authorize the publication of the withdrawn opinion.

Further, because of the addition of subdivision (f) to Article IV, § 19 of the California Constitution and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is ordered that a new judgment be entered declaring that the State of California expressly permits the operation of slot machines, lottery games, and banking and percentage games by federally recognized Indian tribes on Indian lands in California, when Compacts have been entered into in accordance with subdivision (f) and federal law. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees.

The term "Indian lands" is defined in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2703.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 11, 2000
CIV. S-92-812 GEB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2000)
Case details for

Rumsey Indian Rancheria of Wintun Indians v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:RUMSEY INDIAN RANCHERIA OF WINTUN INDIANS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOVERNOR…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 11, 2000

Citations

CIV. S-92-812 GEB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2000)