From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rumph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 4, 1993
615 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Summary

In Rumph v. State of Florida, 615 So.2d 211 (Fla.Dist.App.1993), in a summary opinion, the Florida court affirmed the appellant's convictions for aggravated assault and shooting into an occupied vehicle.

Summary of this case from State v. Taylor

Opinion

No. 92-408.

March 4, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Okaloosa County, G. Robert Barron, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Jamie Spivey, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Sara D. Baggett, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant's convictions for aggravated assault and shooting into an occupied vehicle are affirmed. Because the state introduced competent, substantial evidence on each element of the offenses charged, the trial judge correctly denied appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal on each count. Dual convictions for aggravated assault and shooting into an occupied vehicle are authorized by section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes (1991). Price v. State, 577 So.2d 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), quashed on other grounds, 595 So.2d 951 (Fla. 1992).

In addition to addressing the issue of the validity of dual convictions for aggravated assault and shooting into an occupied vehicle, the panel in Price v. State, 577 So.2d 682 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), certified as a question of great public importance whether section 775.084(1)(a)1, Florida Statutes (1989), the habitual offender statute, required that each of the felonies be committed after conviction for the immediately previous offense. This was the same question previously certified to the supreme court in Barnes v. State, 576 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The supreme court accepted jurisdiction and issued a cursory decision quashing this court's decision in Price on the authority of its decision in State v. Barnes, 595 So.2d 22 (Fla. 1992). The supreme court did not specifically address the issue of the validity of dual convictions for the two offenses at issue pursuant to section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes. The validity of dual convictions for aggravated assault and shooting into an occupied vehicle was not an issue in Barnes.

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, SMITH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rumph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 4, 1993
615 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

In Rumph v. State of Florida, 615 So.2d 211 (Fla.Dist.App.1993), in a summary opinion, the Florida court affirmed the appellant's convictions for aggravated assault and shooting into an occupied vehicle.

Summary of this case from State v. Taylor
Case details for

Rumph v. State

Case Details

Full title:ELTON RUMPH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 4, 1993

Citations

615 So. 2d 211 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

State v. Taylor

Finding no legislative intent to the contrary, the court concluded that convictions for assault and…