From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rumph v. RWF, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 29, 1980
275 S.C. 221 (S.C. 1980)

Opinion

21278

July 29, 1980.

W.D. Rhoad and B. Monroe Hiers, Bamberg, for appellant. Doyet A. Earley, III, Bamberg and Terry E. Richardson, Jr., of Blatt Fales, Barnwell, for respondent.


July 29, 1980.


The administrator initiated this action as a result of injuries to Lucille Rumph which ultimately resulted in her death. The City of Bamberg interposed a demurrer which was denied. The City has appealed whereby it raises the question of sovereign immunity and the inability of the plaintiff to bring suit under the provisions of Section 5-7-70, S.C. Code of Laws (1976). Accordingly, the critical question is whether or not the injuries involved are the result of a defect in the street so as to be envisioned by the aforementioned statutory exception to the general rule of sovereign immunity.

We agree with the trial judge that this matter is best decided in light of the evidence to be adduced at trial. His action is affirmed and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. We intimate no opinion as to the ultimate viability of the plaintiff's claim.

Affirmed.

LITTLEJOHN, GREGORY and HARWELL, JJ., concur.

NESS. J., disqualified.


Summaries of

Rumph v. RWF, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 29, 1980
275 S.C. 221 (S.C. 1980)
Case details for

Rumph v. RWF, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Earthlee RUMPH, as Administrator of the Estate of Lucille Rumph…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 29, 1980

Citations

275 S.C. 221 (S.C. 1980)
268 S.E.2d 584

Citing Cases

Todd v. S.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co.

Ford v. Hutson, S.C. 276 S.E.2d 776. Of course, we intimate no opinion as to the ultimate viability of the…