From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rumage v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 10, 1959
324 S.W.2d 865 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)

Opinion

No. 30846.

June 10, 1959.

Appeal from 110th Judicial District Court, Briscoe County; L. D. Ratliff, Judge.

No attorney on appeal for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


Upon a plea of guilty before the court without a jury, appellant was convicted of the offense of burglary and his punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for 10 years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

The record presents two formal bills of exception by which appellant complains of the fact that he had not been served with a copy of the indictment at the time of trial and to the court's action in refusing to permit him to withdraw his plea of guilty and change the plea to one of not guilty.

The questions presented are the same as those urged and this day overruled in Milligan v. State of Texas, Tex.Cr.App., 324 S.W.2d 864.

No reversible error appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Opinion approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Rumage v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 10, 1959
324 S.W.2d 865 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
Case details for

Rumage v. State

Case Details

Full title:M. L. RUMAGE, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 10, 1959

Citations

324 S.W.2d 865 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)

Citing Cases

Devary v. State

"A liberal practice prevails in this state concerning the withdrawal of a guilty plea, Garcia v. State, 91…

Nunez v. State

A liberal practice prevails in this state concerning the withdrawal of a guilty plea, Garcia v. State, 91…