From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruiz v. N.Y. City

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 4, 2007
44 A.D.3d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Summary

reducing award for past pain and suffering where plaintiff fractured her ankle and required open reduction internal fixation surgery to $100,000, by stipulation

Summary of this case from Soto v. United States

Opinion

No. 1610.

October 4, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edgar G. Walker, J.), entered July 6, 2006, which, upon a jury verdict in plaintiffs favor, awarded $350,000 for past pain and suffering and $750,000 for future pain and suffering over a period of 34 years, plus interest, costs and disbursements, unanimously modified, on the facts, to the extent of vacating the jury's award for past and future pain and suffering and remanding the matter for a new trial solely on the issue of such damages and otherwise affirmed, without costs, unless plaintiff, within 30 days of service of a copy of this order with notice of entry, stipulates to a reduction of the award for past pain and suffering to $100,000 and for future pain and suffering to $200,000, and to entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith.

Steve S. Efron, New York (Renee L. Cyr of counsel), for appellants.

Myers Galiardo, LLP, New York (Christopher D. Galiardo of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Sullivan, Catterson, McGuire and Malone, JJ.


Plaintiff, a passenger on a bus owned and/or operated by defendants, was injured when the driver brought the vehicle to a sudden stop, causing her to fall to the floor. She underwent surgery for a fractured right ankle, involving open reduction and internal fixation with a plate and screws, and remained in the hospital for a week. The $1.1 million award deviates materially from reasonable compensation for this injury to the extent indicated ( see CPLR 5501 [c]). The 46-year-old plaintiff experienced an uncomplicated recovery, with few limitations other than inability to walk for long periods of time and some occasional pain that she treats with over-the-counter medication ( see e.g. Uriondo v Timberline Camplands, Inc., 19 AD3d 282, lv denied 6 NY3d 704 [2006]; Clark v N-H Farms, Inc., 15 AD3d 605).


Summaries of

Ruiz v. N.Y. City

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 4, 2007
44 A.D.3d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

reducing award for past pain and suffering where plaintiff fractured her ankle and required open reduction internal fixation surgery to $100,000, by stipulation

Summary of this case from Soto v. United States
Case details for

Ruiz v. N.Y. City

Case Details

Full title:LOURDES RUIZ, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 4, 2007

Citations

44 A.D.3d 331 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7347
843 N.Y.S.2d 40

Citing Cases

Vincent v. Landi

evidence and our review of comparable damage awards for past pain and suffering involving ankle fractures…

Soto v. United States

Based on these facts and considering comparable cases, the Court determines that Plaintiff would be entitled…