From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ruiz v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 1, 2022
2:21-cv-04197-JFW-PVC (C.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-04197-JFW-PVC

06-01-2022

ERICA RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


JUDGMENT OF REMAND

HON. PEDRO V. CASTILLO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court having approved the parties' Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and to Entry of Judgment (“Stipulation of Remand”) lodged concurrent with the lodging of the within Judgment of Remand.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the abovecaptioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Stipulation of Remand.

In Bastidas v. Chappell, 791 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2015), the Ninth Circuit held that the magistrate judge had the authority to grant Petitioner's request to dismiss two unexhausted claims in his habeas petition without the approval of a district judge, as the magistrate judge's order was simply “doing what [the] habeas petitioner has asked.” Id. at 1165. While Bastidas is not entirely on point, the stipulation for remand and entry of judgment here is jointly made by the parties, without any compulsion from the magistrate judge. Because there appears to be no danger of undue prejudice to any party, the Court grants the request.


Summaries of

Ruiz v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 1, 2022
2:21-cv-04197-JFW-PVC (C.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Ruiz v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:ERICA RUIZ, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 1, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-04197-JFW-PVC (C.D. Cal. Jun. 1, 2022)