From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubinstein v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 7, 1960
11 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

June 7, 1960


Judgment appealed from is reversed on the law, upon the facts and in the exercise of discretion and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellants. Conduct of counsel during the trial added to the confused atmosphere and precluded a trial fair to either plaintiffs or defendants. While the criticism in the main is directed to plaintiffs' counsel, defendants' counsel cannot escape entirely this criticism. Trial tactics which appear calculated to influence the jury by considerations which are not legitimately before them, side remarks to the jury on the conduct of opposing counsel, the witnesses, or improper comments on and unfair characterization of testimony as it is given will not be condoned. It is unfortunate that this conduct requires a new trial in the interest of justice. ( Kohlmann v. City of New York, 8 A.D.2d 598.)

Concur — Botein, P.J., Breitel, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.; M.M. Frank, J. deceased. [ 20 Misc.2d 575.]


Summaries of

Rubinstein v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 7, 1960
11 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Rubinstein v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:DORA RUBINSTEIN et al., Respondents, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Citing Cases

Diaz v. Williams

He should know that resort to such practices to win a verdict may imperil the very verdict which he seeks.…