From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rubens v. Wiss Building Associates

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 6, 1966
219 A.2d 176 (N.J. 1966)

Opinion

Argued April 5, 1966 —

Decided April 6, 1966.

Appeal from Superior Court, Chancery Division.

Mr. Mortimer L. Schultz, in propria persona argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Adrian M. Foley, Jr., and Mr. David J. Schapira argued the cause for respondents.


Defendant, Mortimer L. Schultz, appeals from the order and judgment of the Chancery Division of the Superior Court approving of a plan whereby the assets of the limited partnership were conveyed to a corporation, the shares of which were issued to the limited partners in proportion to their interest. The defendant Schultz charges that the trial court erred in holding that he was not entitled to any interest in the assets of the limited partnership and was not entitled to receive any shares of stock of the said corporation. He alleges also that the trial court should have ordered liquidation of the assets of the limited partnership by sale. We are satisfied that the trial court correctly disposed of the issues in this case and the order and judgment is accordingly in all respects affirmed. Our mandate shall issue forthwith.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL and SCHETTINO. — 5.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Rubens v. Wiss Building Associates

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 6, 1966
219 A.2d 176 (N.J. 1966)
Case details for

Rubens v. Wiss Building Associates

Case Details

Full title:OTTO RUBENS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WISS BUILDING ASSOCIATES, A…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 6, 1966

Citations

219 A.2d 176 (N.J. 1966)
219 A.2d 176

Citing Cases

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

McClintock v. Trenton, 47 N.J. 102, 219 A.2d 510 (1966). Rubens v. Wiss Bldg. Assocs., 47 N.J. 53, 219 A.2d…