From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

RSH Constructors, Inc. v. Rose Creek Associates, Ltd.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 7, 1988
527 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. BS-352.

July 7, 1988.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County; Clifford B. Shepherd, Judge.

G. Kenneth Norrie of Rogers, Towers, Bailey, Jones Gay, Jacksonville, for appellant.

William G. Cooper of Coker, Myers Schickel, P.A., Jacksonville, for appellees.


This cause is before us on appeal from a partial final judgment entered as to Count I of appellant's multi-count complaint in a construction contract dispute. After oral arguments and on consideration of the briefs and record on appeal, we find that the order sought to be reviewed is neither a final appealable order nor a nonfinal order that is appealable under Rule 9.130, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. The counts remaining to be tried below involve the same parties and are interdependent with the count disposed of by summary judgment. Kirkland v. State, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 489 So.2d 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Jones v. Wright, 391 So.2d 313 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

ERVIN, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

RSH Constructors, Inc. v. Rose Creek Associates, Ltd.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jul 7, 1988
527 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

RSH Constructors, Inc. v. Rose Creek Associates, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:RSH CONSTRUCTORS, INC., APPELLANT, v. ROSE CREEK ASSOCIATES, LTD., AND…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jul 7, 1988

Citations

527 So. 2d 967 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Tech. v. Planning Sys

Because the remaining count involves the same transaction and the same parties, the order does not fully…

Tech. Mar. Serv. v. Planning Sys.

PER CURIAM. DISMISSED. RSH Constructors v. Rose Creek Associates, 527 So.2d 967 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988);…