From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Royle v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 4, 1979
258 S.E.2d 921 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)

Opinion

57725.

ARGUED APRIL 11, 1979.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1979.

D. U. I., etc. Cobb State Court. Before Judge Robinson.

Vincent M. Royle, pro se. Herbert A. Rivers, Solicitor, for appellee.


Defendant was indicted for the offenses of driving under the influence, reckless driving and speeding. Defendant appeals, pro se, the judgment of the trial court entered in accordance with a jury verdict of guilty on all counts. We affirm.

As appellant has failed to present argument or authorities in support of his contentions of error, such contentions are deemed abandoned. Terrell v. State, 138 Ga. App. 74 (5) ( 225 S.E.2d 470).

We have nonetheless reviewed the judgment on the general grounds. As there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict of guilty (on all counts), we must affirm the judgment of the court below. Ridley v. State, 236 Ga. 147 (1) ( 223 S.E.2d 131).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.


ARGUED APRIL 11, 1979 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 4, 1979 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Royle v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 4, 1979
258 S.E.2d 921 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
Case details for

Royle v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROYLE v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 4, 1979

Citations

258 S.E.2d 921 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979)
258 S.E.2d 921

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Property Bankers, Inc.

Appellant has abandoned his remaining enumerations of error as they are not supported in his brief by…

McClure v. State

In failing to present such authority his contention is deemed abandoned. See Royle v. State, 151 Ga. App. 88…