From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roy v. U.S. Government

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 21, 2009
Case No. 09-11905 (E.D. Mich. May. 21, 2009)

Summary

dismissing submission "comprised of multiple pages containing illegible hand-written notations scrawled across them" as frivolous and malicious

Summary of this case from Roy v. Doe

Opinion

Case No. 09-11905.

May 21, 2009


OPINION AND ORDER


Plaintiff Kamal Karna Roy, a/k/a Jungle Democracy, filed this pro se action on May 19, 2009. Plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which this Court grants. The Court, however, dismisses his action sua sponte.

In a case where the plaintiff is permitted to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) requires the court to dismiss the action if: "(A) the allegation of poverty is untrue; or (B) the action . . . — (i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief." An action is frivolous if it "lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact." Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S. Ct. 1827, 1831-32 (1989). A malicious complaint is one that "duplicates allegations of another pending federal lawsuit by the same plaintiff." Roy v. United States, No. 06-685-SLR, 2007 WL 1109296, at *2 (D. Del. April 11, 2007) (citing Pittman v. Moore, 908 F.2d 994, 995 (5th Cir. 1993)). This Court finds that Plaintiff's pending lawsuit is both frivolous and malicious.

With regard to frivolousness, Plaintiff's submission is comprised of multiple pages containing illegible hand-written notations scrawled across them. Even where the Court is able to read Plaintiff's ramblings, it is unable able to identify a comprehensible sentence, let alone a "(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends . . ." or "(2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief," as required under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court is not even certain who Plaintiff intends to sue in this case, as his submission does not contain a traditional caption. The Court has only discerned that he is suing the United States because his application to proceed in forma pauperis lists "USA Govt et al."

With respect to maliciousness, Plaintiff has filed numerous actions in jurisdictions throughout this country, similar to the action now pending. One district court judge identified more than fifteen cases filed by Plaintiff as of April 2007. See Roy v. United States, No. 06-685-SLR, 2007 WL 1109296, at *1 (D. Del. April 11, 2007). Westlaw and the U.S. Party/Case Index, PACER Service Center, available at http://pacer.psc.uscourts, reveal at least ninety (90) additional cases filed by Plaintiff as of today's date. See Attachment A. Many of these previous lawsuits have been dismissed as frivolous by the courts in which they were filed. Courts in many jurisdictions have either warned Plaintiff that future similar filings will result in an injunction barring him from filing any additional actions in forma pauperis or denied him the right to file any additional actions without leave from the court outright.

One court permanently enjoined Plaintiff from filing any subsequent cases after it found sewing needles stuck into two pages of his complaint. Roy v. CBS, Inc., No. 07-206-SLR (D. Del. May 4, 2007).

"A district court has the authority to issue an injunctive order to prevent prolific and vexatious litigants from filing pleadings without first meeting pre-filing restrictions." Stewart v. Fleet Fin., No. 99-2282, 2000 WL 1176881, at *2 (6th Cir. Aug. 10, 2000) (citing Feathers v. Chevron U.S.A., 141 F.3d 264, 269 (6th Cir. 1998)). In light of Plaintiffs history of initiating repetitive and frivolous lawsuits and to avoid clogging the dockets in this jurisdiction with such filings, this Court enjoins Plaintiff from filing similar complaints in this district without leave of court. This means that, unless leave of court is granted, Plaintiff is barred from filing any complaint in this jurisdiction that is illegible or that fails to plainly identify the named defendants, the claims alleged, facts supporting those claims, and the relief requested.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED, that Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2);

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Plaintiff is enjoined from filing similar complaints in this district unless he seeks and obtains leave of court.

Attachment A U.S. Party/Case Index Civil Name Search Results 111 Total Party matches for selection ROY, KAMAL for ALL COURTS Search Complete Wed May 20 14:19:06 2009 Selections 55 through 108 (Page 2)Download (3 pages $0.00) Previous 54 Next 3 Name Court Case No. Filed NOS Closed paedce 2:2007cv03690 paedce 2:2008cv05576 codce 1:2009cv00190 ctdce 3:2007mc00239 codce 1:2007cv01172 codce 1:2008cv01305 codce 1:2008cv01857 codce 1:2008cv02245 codce 1:2008cv02596 paedce 2:2006cv05367 mtdce 6:2008cv00004 hidce 1:2009cv00006 paedce 2:2009cv00007 hidce 1:2009cv00013 wvndce 5:2007cv00014 nyndce 7:2006cv00031 mtdce 6:2007cv00059 mtdce 6:2008cv00080 mtdce 9:2008cv00085 nyedce 1:2009mc00095 dedce 1:2008mc00102 nhdce 1:2007cv00199 dedce 1:2007cv00206 hidce 1:2008cv00232 hidce 1:2008cv00234 hidce 1:2008cv00316 nhdce 1:2007fp00336 nyedce 1:2007cv00340 nyedce 1:2008cv00388 hidce 1:2008cv00401 nyndce 8:2009cv00403 hidce 1:2008cv00415 hidce 1:2008cv00424 wawdce 2:2009cv00429 hidce 1:2008cv00448 nyndce 8:2008cv00455 dedce 1:2006cv00503 hidce 1:2008cv00519 hidce 1:2007cv00543 nyedce 1:2008mc00554 hidce 1:2008cv00580 dedce 1:2006cv00685 nyndce 8:2008cv01075 nyedce 1:2008cv01257 wawdce 2:2008cv01626 txsdce 4:2008cv02345 txsdce 4:2006cv02538 nyedce 1:2007cv02930 nyedce 1:2008cv03120 nyedce 1:2007cv03420 nyedce 1:2007cv04889 madce 1:2007cv11208 miedce 2:2009cv11905 wydce 2:2008cv00021 55 ROY, KAMAL K. K. 09/07/2007 440 09/07/2007 56 ROY, KAMAL K. K. 11/28/2008 440 12/03/2008 57 ROY, KAMAL K.K. 01/30/2009 440 03/12/2009 58 ROY, KAMAL K.K. 08/20/2007 440 59 ROY, KAMAL K.K. 06/05/2007 440 07/27/2007 60 ROY, KAMAL K.K. 06/20/2008 440 08/11/2008 61 ROY, KAMAL K.K. 08/29/2008 440 10/09/2008 62 ROY, KAMAL K.K. 10/16/2008 440 11/28/2008 63 ROY, KAMAL K.K. 12/01/2008 440 01/08/2009 64 ROY, KAMAL K.K. 12/20/2006 440 12/20/2006 65 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 01/14/2008 440 02/19/2008 66 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 01/06/2009 441 01/27/2009 67 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 01/02/2009 440 01/15/2009 68 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 01/08/2009 440 02/10/2009 69 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 01/26/2007 440 09/09/2008 70 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 01/10/2006 440 11/14/2006 71 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 09/24/2007 440 11/15/2007 72 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 11/25/2008 440 01/09/2009 73 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 06/05/2008 440 07/21/2008 74 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 02/10/2009 02/10/2009 75 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 05/28/2008 890 76 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 07/23/2007 440 09/05/2007 77 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 04/18/2007 440 05/08/2007 78 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 06/24/2008 440 07/24/2008 79 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 05/19/2008 441 80 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 07/07/2008 440 07/30/2008 81 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 10/15/2007 440 82 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 01/12/2007 890 02/20/2007 83 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 01/17/2008 890 02/20/2008 84 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 09/05/2008 440 10/21/2008 85 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 04/06/2009 440 86 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 09/12/2008 440 12/02/2008 87 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 09/22/2008 441 10/22/2008 88 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 04/01/2009 440 89 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 10/08/2008 440 10/27/2008 90 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 05/20/2008 441 09/23/2008 91 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 08/14/2006 440 09/13/2006 92 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 11/17/2008 440 01/26/2009 93 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 10/29/2007 440 11/05/2007 94 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 10/09/2008 03/30/2009 95 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 12/22/2008 441 03/10/2009 96 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 04/19/2007 440 04/24/2007 97 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 10/09/2008 440 04/01/2009 98 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 03/21/2008 890 04/11/2008 99 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 11/05/2008 440 01/05/2009 100 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 07/25/2008 890 12/10/2008 101 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 08/01/2006 864 12/21/2006 102 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 06/29/2007 440 12/06/2007 103 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 07/23/2008 890 08/13/2008 104 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 08/09/2007 890 12/06/2007 105 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 11/15/2007 890 12/06/2007 106 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 07/02/2007 440 08/02/2007 107 ROY, KAMAL KARNA 05/19/2009 440 108 ROY, KAMAL KARNA K 01/15/2008 441 02/28/2008

Previous 54 Next 3

PACER Service Center Transaction Receipt PACER Login: Client Code: Description: Search Criteria: Billable Pages: Cost: U.S. Party/Case Index — Home Search: All Court Types Appellate Bankruptcy Civil Criminal Reports: Court Code List Date Range Courts not on Index Statistical Reports User Options: Change Client Code New Login Billing History PSC Home Page E-Mail PSC Logout 05/20/2009 14:19:35 us4424 roy Civil srch pg 2 ROY, KAMAL 1 0.08 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ U.S. Party/Case Index Civil Name Search Results 111 Total Party matches for selection ROY, KAMAL for ALL COURTS Search Complete Wed May 20 14:19:06 2009 Selections 109 through 111 (Page 3) Download (3 pages $0.00)Previous 54 Name Court Case No. Filed NOS Closed wydce 2:2008cv00117 wydce 2:2008cv00172 wydce 2:2007cv00246 109 ROY, KAMAL KARNA K 05/05/2008 441 07/21/2008 110 ROY, KAMAL KARNA K 07/07/2008 440 07/21/2008 111 ROY, KAMAL KARNA K 10/09/2007 440 12/06/2007

Previous 54

PACER Service Center Transaction Receipt PACER Login: Client Code: Description: Search Criteria: Billable Pages: Cost: U.S. Party/Case Index — Home Search: All Court Types Appellate Bankruptcy Civil Criminal Reports: Court Code List Date Range Courts not on Index Statistical Reports User Options: Change Client Code New Login Billing History PSC Home Page E-Mail PSC Logout 05/20/2009 14:20:22 us4424 roy Civil srch pg 3 ROY, KAMAL 1 0.08 ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦

Help


Summaries of

Roy v. U.S. Government

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 21, 2009
Case No. 09-11905 (E.D. Mich. May. 21, 2009)

dismissing submission "comprised of multiple pages containing illegible hand-written notations scrawled across them" as frivolous and malicious

Summary of this case from Roy v. Doe

noting the lack of "a comprehensible sentence"

Summary of this case from Roy v. United States Gov't
Case details for

Roy v. U.S. Government

Case Details

Full title:KAMAL KARNA ROY, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: May 21, 2009

Citations

Case No. 09-11905 (E.D. Mich. May. 21, 2009)

Citing Cases

Roy v. Doe

Plaintiff has filed similarly unintelligible complaints in other federal district courts that have been…

ROY v. 2 DEMOCRATIC SENATORS OF NYS ALBANY, NY

Moreover, it is important to note that many of the 162 actions that Plaintiff has filed (including this one)…