From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rousey v. Rousey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Apr 8, 1986
507 A.2d 1046 (D.C. 1986)

Opinion

No. 84-669.

April 8, 1986.

Before PRYOR, C.J., and NEBEKER, MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, TERRY, ROGERS and STEADMAN, Associate Judges.


ORDER


On consideration of appellee's petition for rehearing and/or rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED by the merits division that the petition for rehearing is denied; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

Associate Judges Mack and Terry voted to deny rehearing en banc.

FURTHER ORDERED that appellee's petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of October 31, 1985, 499 A.2d 1199, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the business of the court permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before April 18, 1986.


Summaries of

Rousey v. Rousey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Apr 8, 1986
507 A.2d 1046 (D.C. 1986)
Case details for

Rousey v. Rousey

Case Details

Full title:Smith W. ROUSEY, Appellant, v. Doris S. ROUSEY, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 8, 1986

Citations

507 A.2d 1046 (D.C. 1986)

Citing Cases

Rousey v. Rousey

A division of the court, recognizing that the doctrine of parental immunity had never been established as the…