From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roulhac v. Prison Health Servs.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 20, 2012
474 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 12-6528

06-20-2012

CLARENCE ROULHAC, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES; LINDA RAY, Ms., Head Nurse, Powhatan Correctional Center; L. KUMP, Ms., Doctor, Powhatan Correctional Center; A. TONEY, Mr., Doctor, Powhatan Correctional Center; B. S. JANEK, DMD, Dentist, Powhatan Correctional Center; FRED SCHILLINGS, Dr., Health Service Director, VDOC, Defendants - Appellees.

Clarence Roulhac, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia; John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00408-HEH) Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Roulhac, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Martin Muldowney, RAWLS & MCNELIS, PC, Richmond, Virginia; John Michael Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Clarence Roulhac, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's orders dismissing four of five defendants in Roulhac's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action and denying as moot Roulhac's motion for summary judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Roulhac seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Roulhac v. Prison Health Servs.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 20, 2012
474 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Roulhac v. Prison Health Servs.

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE ROULHAC, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRISON HEALTH SERVICES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 20, 2012

Citations

474 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

Patel v. Moron

Because plaintiff alleges that his deprivation of medication resulted in emergency treatment for high blood…

Patel v. Moron

Because plaintiff alleges that his deprivation of medication resulted in emergency treatment for high blood…