From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roughlands Realty Corp. v. Bridgman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 26, 1945
184 Misc. 309 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)

Summary

In Friedman v. Margiotta, 53 N.Y.S.2d 79 (1st Dept. 1949), damages were based in part on lessees' failure to remove all fixtures.

Summary of this case from In re Hyong Jin Kim

Opinion

January 26, 1945.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, KELEHER, J.

Clifton F. Weidlich for appellant.

Walter M. Hinkle for respondent.


MEMORANDUM


The parties litigated the issues raised by the fourth cause of action before the Office of Price Administration and the plaintiff complied with the ruling against it. The same issues, therefore, may not be relitigated in the State court. The first three causes of action are sufficient as matter of law.

The order should be modified by dismissing the fourth cause of action, and as modified affirmed, with leave to defendant to answer within five days after service of order entered hereon.

HAMMER, SHIENTAG and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.


Summaries of

Roughlands Realty Corp. v. Bridgman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 26, 1945
184 Misc. 309 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)

In Friedman v. Margiotta, 53 N.Y.S.2d 79 (1st Dept. 1949), damages were based in part on lessees' failure to remove all fixtures.

Summary of this case from In re Hyong Jin Kim
Case details for

Roughlands Realty Corp. v. Bridgman

Case Details

Full title:ROUGHLANDS REALTY CORPORATION, Respondent, v. DONALD S. BRIDGMAN, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 26, 1945

Citations

184 Misc. 309 (N.Y. App. Term 1945)
53 N.Y.S.2d 79

Citing Cases

In re Hyong Jin Kim

Therefore the Mandinas are precluded from now objecting to the damages incidental to the removal of trade and…

Civic Realty Co. v. New York Tel. Co.

Similar provisions respecting the phrase "good order and condition" have been the subject of considerable…