From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rottenberg v. Lerner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1996
232 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

October 7, 1996.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated August 28, 1995, which denied their motion to vacate a judgment entered upon their default in answering.

Before: Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court did not improvidently deny the defendants' motion to vacate the default judgment entered against them. The defendants' contention that they were unable to afford counsel is not a reasonable excuse for their default ( Moore v Claudio, 224 AD2d 502; see, People v Scudds, 195 AD2d 778, 779; City of New York v Simmonds, 172 AD2d 1081).


Summaries of

Rottenberg v. Lerner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 7, 1996
232 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Rottenberg v. Lerner

Case Details

Full title:UDBL ROTTENBERG, Respondent, v. ARON A. LERNER et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1996

Citations

232 A.D.2d 395 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
648 N.Y.S.2d 313

Citing Cases

O'Donnell v. Frangakis

e law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the defendant's motion to vacate the order dated May…

Molesky v. Molesky

Defendant's medical evidence establishes neither that he was unable to appear or defend against plaintiff's…