From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roth v. Securities and Exchange Commission

U.S.
Nov 28, 1994
513 U.S. 1015 (1994)

Summary

holding that an individual supervisor who does not otherwise qualify as an employer cannot be held liable for a violation of Title VII

Summary of this case from Maxwell v. Kight

Opinion

No. 94-404.

November 28, 1994.


C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 22 F. 3d 1108.


Summaries of

Roth v. Securities and Exchange Commission

U.S.
Nov 28, 1994
513 U.S. 1015 (1994)

holding that an individual supervisor who does not otherwise qualify as an employer cannot be held liable for a violation of Title VII

Summary of this case from Maxwell v. Kight

approving attorney time records that "included the date, the attorney, the time expended, and a general statement of work done"

Summary of this case from Grant Family Farms v. Liqua-Dry

interpreting similar agency language in Title VII and finding that it imposed liability only on individuals who independently meet the definition of employer

Summary of this case from Seal v. Gateway Companies, Inc.

interpreting similar agency language in Title VII and finding that it imposed liability only on individuals who independently meet the definition of employer

Summary of this case from Seal v. Gateway Companies, Inc.

discussing definition of "employer" under FMLA

Summary of this case from Cantrell v. Bauhaus, U.S.A., Inc.
Case details for

Roth v. Securities and Exchange Commission

Case Details

Full title:ROTH v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 28, 1994

Citations

513 U.S. 1015 (1994)

Citing Cases

Commonwealth v. Brown

Where an action has been brought to impose a forfeiture of the proceeds from unlawful drug sales, we have…

Colbert v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

Title VII does not permit the imposition of liability upon individuals, even those functioning in a…