From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roth v. Hart Assocs. of Springville Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 12, 2015
133 A.D.3d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

11-12-2015

In the Matter of the Claim of Janet L. ROTH, Appellant. Hart Associates of Springville Inc., Respondent. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Janet L. Roth, Gowanda, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.


Janet L. Roth, Gowanda, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for Commissioner of Labor, respondent.

Opinion Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 17, 2014, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Decision affirmed. No opinion.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

LAHTINEN, J.P., McCARTHY, EGAN JR. and DEVINE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Roth v. Hart Assocs. of Springville Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Nov 12, 2015
133 A.D.3d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Roth v. Hart Assocs. of Springville Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of Janet L. ROTH, Appellant. Hart Associates of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 12, 2015

Citations

133 A.D.3d 1024 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 8239
18 N.Y.S.3d 895

Citing Cases

Wilder v. Cadle

In an amended petition it was alleged that defendant discovered the peril of the plaintiff and thereafter…

Scholl v. Margulis

Schmidt v. City of Newport, et al., 184 Ky. 342. And if a plaintiff allege negligence in general terms he may…