From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rossnagle v. Capra and Shell Oil Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 19, 1974
318 A.2d 20 (N.J. 1974)

Opinion

Argued March 5, 1974 —

Decided March 19, 1974.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 127 N.J. Super. 507 (1974).

Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Leigh E. Buggeln argued the cause for respondent Bob Capra ( Messrs. Lawrie, Jennings, and Buggeln, attorneys).

Mr. Joseph D. Haggerty argued the cause for respondent Barry Rossnagle.


The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Matthews filed below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices JACOBS, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Rossnagle v. Capra and Shell Oil Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 19, 1974
318 A.2d 20 (N.J. 1974)
Case details for

Rossnagle v. Capra and Shell Oil Co.

Case Details

Full title:BARRY ROSSNAGLE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BOB CAPRA…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 19, 1974

Citations

318 A.2d 20 (N.J. 1974)
318 A.2d 20

Citing Cases

Smith v. E.T.L. Enterprises

Caicco v. Toto Brothers, Inc., 62 N.J. 305, 310 (1973). As noted in Rossnagle v. Capra and Shell Oil Co., 127…

Pollack v. Pino's Formal Wear & Tailoring

Caicco v. Toto Brothers, Inc., 62 N.J. 305, 310 [ 301 A.2d 143] (1973). As noted in Rossnagle v. Capra and…