From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Mullis Tree Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 10, 1987
183 Ga. App. 627 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

74842.

DECIDED JULY 10, 1987.

Zoning. Bibb Superior Court. Before Judge Morgan.

F. Robert Raley, for appellants.

Tim D. Hemingway, for appellee.


The appellants appealed to superior court by writ of certiorari form an adverse decision of the Macon-Bibb County Planning and Zoning Commission, granting an application by Mullis Tree Service, Inc., to allow certain property to be used as a landfill. The superior court dismissed the appeal based on the appellants' failure to serve Mullis Tree Service with a copy of the petition in a timely manner. The appellants then filed a direct appeal to this court, which Mullis Tree Service has moved to dismiss based on the appellants' failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedures set forth at OCGA § 5-6-35. Held:

This court has previously held that OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1) is applicable to appeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of local zoning tribunals, regardless of whether the appeal was dismissed by the superior court or whether a ruling on the merits was issued. See Brewer v. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 170 Ga. App. 351 ( 317 S.E.2d 327) (1984). The motion to dismiss the present appeal is accordingly granted.

Appeal dismissed. Carley and Benham, JJ., concur.

DECIDED JULY 10, 1987.


Summaries of

Ross v. Mullis Tree Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jul 10, 1987
183 Ga. App. 627 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Ross v. Mullis Tree Service, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROSS et al. v. MULLIS TREE SERVICE, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jul 10, 1987

Citations

183 Ga. App. 627 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)
360 S.E.2d 288

Citing Cases

Trend Development Corp. v. Douglas County

The constitutional provisions govern which appellate court has jurisdiction of a matter subject to appeal.…

Bell v. Dekalb Cnty.

Such compliance is required even where the superior court dismisses the action. See Ross v. Mullis Tree…