Summary
In Ross v. New London, 3 Conn.Cir.Ct. 644, 645, 222 A.2d 816, cert. denied, 154 Conn. 717, 221 A.2d 272 (1966), the court held that the plaintiff’s notice, which stated that "the fall was caused by the neglect of the city in the maintenance and repair of the sidewalk" was insufficient and concluded by asking: "What exactly was the neglect of the city... which brought about the injuries claimed by the plaintiff?
Summary of this case from Castillo-Blain v. Town of WethersfieldOpinion
Richard E. Gruskin, in support of the petition.
Submitted June 6, 1966
Decided July 19, 1966
The petition by the plaintiff for certification for appeal from the Appellate Division of the Circuit Court is denied.