From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross Oil Corp. v. Foshee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 8, 1988
517 So. 2d 713 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-589.

December 10, 1987. Rehearing Denied January 8, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Frederick T. Pfeiffer, J.

Jeffrey S. Goldman of Hayt, Hayt Landau, Orlando, for appellant.

James E. Foster and William M. Lindeman of Foster Kelly, Orlando, for appellee.


Shee-Con, Inc. applied for a line of credit with Roquemore Oil Company, the predecessor corporation of appellant Ross Oil Corporation. James E. Foshee was an officer and principal stockholder in Shee-Con, Inc. The following paragraph was appended to the written credit application:If a Corporation

To induce Roquemore Oil Company to extend credit to the above applicant Corporation, the undersigned principal Stockholder(s) guarantee(s) payment of any and all liabilities incurred by applicant Corporation. When Shee-Con, Inc. failed to pay the creditor corporation (Ross Oil Corporation), Ross Oil Corporation sued James E. Foshee personally under the above-quoted guarantee language. Foshee defended on the basis that the writing was ambiguous. The trial court in a non-jury trial permitted Foshee to testify that when he signed as shown above, he intended to do so only as an officer of Shee-Con, Inc. and did not intend to obligate himself personally. The trial court found as a matter of fact that Foshee did not intend to guarantee personally the debt of Shee-Con, Inc. and entered final judgment against the creditor corporation which brings the appeal.

We reverse and hold as a matter of law that the above-quoted language is not ambiguous and that it was error to permit Foshee to testify that he did not intend to be personally obligated. The debtor corporation, Shee-Con, Inc., was not a stockholder in its corporate self and, in any event, could not guarantee its own obligation. As a matter of law the language quoted above means nothing unless it means that any stockholder signing below was guaranteeing payment of credit extended by the creditor corporation (Roquemore Oil Co. and subsequently Ross Oil Corporation) to the debtor corporation Shee-Con, Inc.

The final judgment in favor of James E. Foshee is reversed and the cause remanded with directions for the trial court to enter an appropriate judgment in favor of Ross Oil Corporation and against James E. Foshee on Foshee's written guarantee of credit extended to Shee-Con, Inc.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ross Oil Corp. v. Foshee

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 8, 1988
517 So. 2d 713 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Ross Oil Corp. v. Foshee

Case Details

Full title:ROSS OIL CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. JAMES E. FOSHEE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 8, 1988

Citations

517 So. 2d 713 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Tampa Bay Econ. Dev. Corp. v. Edman

This language taken together with the fact that the signature block does not contain any reference to the…

Paper Corp. of America v. Sandow

She signed the subject application: "Helen Sandow Continental Graphic, Inc.," which, under established…