From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenfeld Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 4, 1954
101 A.2d 684 (Pa. 1954)

Opinion

November 9, 1953.

January 4, 1954.

Decedents' estates — Widow's intestate share — Exemption from Federal estate tax — Marital deduction — Tax Apportionment Act.

A widow's intestate share in a decedent's estate, which is exempt from Federal estate tax under the marital deduction provision of § 812(e) of the Internal Revenue Code, is exempt from bearing any portion of the Federal estate tax assessed against the decedent's estate: Tax Apportionment Act of July 2, 1937, P. L. 2762.

Argued November 9, 1953. Before STERN, C. J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.

Appeal, No. 243, Jan. T., 1953, from decree of Orphans' Court of Philadelphia County, 1949, No. 1039, in Estate of John M. Rosenfeld, also known as John Rosenfeld and J. Rosenfeld. Decree affirmed.

Proceeding upon citation of residuary legatee and rule to show cause why adjudication of final account of executor should not be vacated and reviewed. Before KLEIN, P. J.

The facts are stated in the opinion by LEFEVER, J., of the court below, KLEIN, P. J., BOLGER, LEFEVER, SAYLOR and SHOYER, JJ., as follows:

The narrow question before the court is whether the widow's intestate share in the decedent's estate, which is exempt from federal estate tax under the marital deduction provision of the federal statute, shall bear any portion of the federal estate tax assessed against the decedent's estate.

The facts are aptly and fully stated in the adjudication of the learned President Judge. Little need be added to that well reasoned adjudication.

The marital deduction provision in the United States Revenue Act of 1948, Section 812(e) Internal Revenue Code, was passed to equalize the federal estate tax between residents of common law states and residents of community property states. So great was the pre-existing inequality that many common law states had adopted, or were contemplating adoption of, community property laws (e.g., The Pennsylvania Community Property Law of 1947 which was declared wholly invalid in Willcox v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, 357 Pa. 581). The lower tax in the community property states resulted from the legal concept that husband and wife each owned absolutely a one-half interest in all the property of husband and wife. Consequently, at the death of a spouse there was a devolution of only one-half of the property owned by the community, and no federal estate tax could be assessed upon the remaining half owned by the surviving spouse.

The marital deduction statute endeavors to accomplish taxwise in common law states what is provided by the civil law in the community property states. Accordingly, where the surviving spouse has absolute control (actual or potential) over the share received by him or her, the requirement of the marital deduction statute is met and no federal estate tax is assessed against that property.

In the instant case, testator's will was revoked pro tanto by his subsequent marriage: Wills Act of 1947, Section 7 (3); see Shestack's Estate, 267 Pa. 115 (1920). (As a precautionary measure the widow also elected to take against the will.) Since testator was survived by two children, his widow's intestate share was one-third of his estate outright. This one-third share of the widow qualified for the marital deduction. Just as in community property states, for federal estate tax purposes, this one-third was treated as though separate and apart from decedent's estate. Consequently, it was not subject to federal estate tax.

Neither the exceptant (one of testator's children) nor the executors were required to pay any tax on the widow's share. In fact, exceptant was benefited by the marital deduction because the decedent's taxable estate was reduced by one-third and, consequently, the tax on exceptant's share was at a lower rate. Testator's will could have no effect whatsoever on the widow's share because the will was revoked as to her. Accordingly, the Tax Apportionment Act of July 2, 1937, P. L. 2762 applies and expressly exempts the widow's share from bearing any portion of the federal estate tax. It would be grossly inequitable to permit exceptant to share in the marital deduction exemption provided specifically and solely for the surviving spouse. To do so would defeat the intent of the federal statute. It follows that no portion of the federal estate tax is chargeable to the widow.

The exceptions are dismissed.

Residuary legatee appealed.

Arthur Silverman, with him Joseph E. Gold, for appellant.

Aaron W. White, with him Nathan I. Miller, for appellee.


The decree is affirmed on the opinion of Judge LEFEVER. Costs to be paid by appellant.


Summaries of

Rosenfeld Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 4, 1954
101 A.2d 684 (Pa. 1954)
Case details for

Rosenfeld Estate

Case Details

Full title:Rosenfeld Estate

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 4, 1954

Citations

101 A.2d 684 (Pa. 1954)
101 A.2d 684

Citing Cases

White v. South Carolina Tax Commission

Messrs. Bruce W. White, of Union, and J. KennethTomlinson, of Columbia, for Appellant, cite: As to the…

Seymour National Bank, Admr. v. Heideman

In the above case the widow elected to take against the will and to take under the law a one-half interest in…