From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenblatt v. Child's. Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 2007
36 A.D.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 9995, Index 107017/05.

January 9, 2007.

Determination of respondent, dated January 27, 2005, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of disciplinary infractions and suspended her for 15 days without pay, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Doris Ling-Cohan, J.], entered October 28, 2005) dismissed, without costs.

Mirkin Gordon, P.C., Great Neck (Joel Spivak of counsel), for petitioner.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Cheryl Payer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Catterson and Malone, JJ.


Respondent Administration for Children's Services' (ACS) determination was supported by substantial evidence ( see CPLR 7803), including several instances of insubordination and disrespect between August and November of 2003. Although petitioner had been an ACS caseworker for nearly seven years, with no prior disciplinary history, the 15-day suspension without pay was not so disproportionate to the offense, in light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( Matter of Peters v County of Rensselaer, 28 AD3d 854; see also Matter of Martinez v City of New York, 281 AD2d 187).


Summaries of

Rosenblatt v. Child's. Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 9, 2007
36 A.D.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Rosenblatt v. Child's. Serv

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CHERYL ROSENBLATT, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 9, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 95
828 N.Y.S.2d 28

Citing Cases

Rosenblatt v. City of New York

The findings of the two administrative law judges were recently upheld by the New York Appellate Division as…

Reveron v. The N.Y. State Office of Court Admin.

ng requirement, which was in effect at all times (compare Matter of Brady Props. v New York City Loft Bd.,…