From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenberg v. Burgess

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 1990
561 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 90-0699.

May 16, 1990.

Robert I. Buchsbaum of Conroy, Simberg Lewis, P.A., Hollywood, for petitioner.

Gary E. Garbis of Gary E. Garbis, P.A., Miami, for respondents.


Here, as in Waste Management, Inc. v. Southern Bell, 544 So.2d 1133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), the trial court prematurely terminated its inquiry into petitioner's work product objection, and departed from the essential requirements of law in determining that petitioner had no right to object to producing items which she herself had asked respondents to produce. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, quash the trial court's February 12, 1990, and March 12, 1990, orders, and remand the case so the court can entertain petitioner's work product objection on its merits.

DOWNEY, GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosenberg v. Burgess

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 16, 1990
561 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Rosenberg v. Burgess

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE LONDON ROSENBERG, PETITIONER, v. SIMEON BURGESS AND CLARISSA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 16, 1990

Citations

561 So. 2d 436 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)