From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenberg Estis, P.C. v. Bergos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 3, 2005
18 A.D.3d 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

5991N.

May 3, 2005.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered November 8, 2004, which denied defendants' motion to vacate the note of issue, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Marlow and Catterson, JJ., concur.


The record in this attorney fee dispute discloses that defendants willfully refused or simply failed to avail themselves of the opportunity to take plaintiff's deposition prior to the deadline set forth in the preliminary conference stipulation, and willfully refused to obtain copies of documents that defense counsel had already inspected and tagged for copying. Under these circumstances, defendants' motion to vacate the note of issue was properly denied since the certificate of readiness correctly represented that defendants had waived any right they had to additional discovery ( cf. Munoz v. 147 Corp., 309 AD2d 647, 648; Ortiz v. Arias, 285 AD2d 390).


Summaries of

Rosenberg Estis, P.C. v. Bergos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 3, 2005
18 A.D.3d 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Rosenberg Estis, P.C. v. Bergos

Case Details

Full title:ROSENBERG ESTIS, P.C., Respondent, v. MICHAEL BERGOS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 3, 2005

Citations

18 A.D.3d 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
794 N.Y.S.2d 341

Citing Cases

Vargas v. Villa Josefa Realty Corp.

Plaintiffs' assertion that defendant waived the right to conduct the IME and further discovery is without…

S.K. v. S.K.

Similarly, defendant's assertion that the depositions of non-party witnesses have not been conducted does not…