In Rosemond [v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2734 (2013)] the U.S. Supreme Court made a substantive rule alteration in the range of conduct or the class of persons the law can punish.
Summary of this case from Eccleston v. OrtizNo. 12–895.
2013-05-28
Justus Cornelius ROSEMOND, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Case below, 695 F.3d 1151.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted.
In Rosemond [v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2734 (2013)] the U.S. Supreme Court made a substantive rule alteration in the range of conduct or the class of persons the law can punish.
Summary of this case from Eccleston v. OrtizFull title:Justus Cornelius ROSEMOND, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States
Date published: May 28, 2013
Through the present motion filed on March 21, 2014, Defendant once again seeks to vacate a portion of his…
United States v. Acosta-Colón[w]hether the offense of aiding and abetting the use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of…